Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT (TDS) Vs Vodafone Cellular Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
CIT (TDS) Vs Vodafone Cellular Ltd. (Bombay High Court) The Bombay High Court held that limitation under Section 201(3) for passing an order under Section 201(1) is to be computed from the end of the financial year in which the TDS statement under Section 200 is filed. Since, under Rule 31A, TDS statements are required to be filed quarterly, the limitation must necessarily be computed quarter-wise and not on a cumulative annual basis. Accordingly, where TDS statements for the first three quarters were filed in FY 2008-09, the order passed on 15 March 2012 was beyond the prescribed limitation...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

NFAC Order Set Aside for Denial of Requested Virtual Hearing: Delhi HC Income Tax Stay Rejection Order Without Reasons Quashed: Allahabad HC Non-Response to Notices Does Not Make Creditors Bogus: ITAT Delhi Section 273B: ITAT Delhi Deletes Form 3CD Penalty Due to Software Error No Section 69A Addition on Disclosed Property Sale Cash Receipts: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031