Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Pravinchandra B Dedhia (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Pravinchandra B Dedhia (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchase Disallowance – Issue of 12.5% vs 100% Addition Remanded to CIT(A) for Fresh Fact Verification – ITAT Mumbai The Revenue challenged the order of the CIT(A) restricting disallowance on alleged bogus purchases to 12.5% instead of sustaining the full addition of ₹48.32 lakh made by the AO u/s 69C. The assessment had been completed u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 based on Investigation Wing information that the assessee obtained accommodation purchase bills from hawala dealers, and due to non-compliance and lack of response to notices, the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification Bogus Purchases: Only Profit Element Taxable – ITAT Upholds 12.5% Estimation Notional Rent on Work-in-Progress Invalid – Section 23 Misapplied Limited Scrutiny Breach &; Explained Cash Deposits – Addition Deleted Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to Profit Element: ITAT Grants Relief View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930