Case Law Details
Case Name : Rashmi Hitesh Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rashmi Hitesh Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Limited Scrutiny Breach & Explained Cash Deposits – Addition Deleted
The ITAT condoned a minor delay of 13 days in filing the appeal due to genuine reasons including the demise of the assessee’s father and procedural delays. On merits, the case involved addition under section 69 for alleged unexplained cash deposits, including during the demonetization period.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by examining total cash deposits despite the case being selected for limited scrutiny only for demonetization deposits. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


