This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penny Stock Addition u/s 68 Set Aside; Reopening Held Invalid for lack of Mind Application
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The assessee challenged reassessment for AYs 2015-16 to 2017-18 where alleged LTCG from Toyam Industries shares was treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. ITAT quashed reassessment across all three years primarily on jurisdictional defects including defective reasons, limitation issues and incorrect sanction authority.
For AY 2015-16 & 2016-17, Tribunal held that reopening was based on factually incorrect and contradictory reasons — AO wrongly treated assessee as accommodation entry provider while later treating her as benefi...





