Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Chandra Dethaliya Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Chandra Dethaliya Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The ITAT, Indore Bench upheld penalty u/s 271A of ₹25,000 for non-maintenance of books of account, holding that opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 does not wipe out independent penalties not linked to quantum additions. In this case, the assessee—a wholesale vegetable trader—had gross receipts of about ₹63.87 lakh, exceeding the threshold u/s 44AA/44AB, yet failed to maintain books. The AO levied penalty u/s 271A, which was affirmed by CIT(A). The assessee argued that since tax arrears were settled under VSV 2024, the penalty shou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930