Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Chandra Dethaliya Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Chandra Dethaliya Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The ITAT, Indore Bench upheld penalty u/s 271A of ₹25,000 for non-maintenance of books of account, holding that opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 does not wipe out independent penalties not linked to quantum additions. In this case, the assessee—a wholesale vegetable trader—had gross receipts of about ₹63.87 lakh, exceeding the threshold u/s 44AA/44AB, yet failed to maintain books. The AO levied penalty u/s 271A, which was affirmed by CIT(A). The assessee argued that since tax arrears were settled under VSV 2024, the penalty shou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid even if based on Material from allegedly Illegal Search or from another Commissionerate-Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031