Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sunjewels Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sunjewels Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) CIT(A) Cannot Set Aside 143(3) Assessment; ITAT Sends Case Back to CIT(A) to Decide on Merits In scrutiny assessment, the AO disallowed purchases of ₹2.21 crore from one supplier and legal/professional expenses of about ₹28.93 lakh for want of supporting evidence. In appeal, the assessee produced detailed additional evidence such as invoices, confirmations, registration details and bank payment proofs. These were sent to the AO for verification in remand proceedings. In his remand report, the AO verified all documents and made no adverse comm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930