Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vashishtha Luxury Fashion Limited Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax/ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vashishtha Luxury Fashion Limited Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax/ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Belated Return Does Not Defeat Section 115BAA Benefit — ITAT Allows Concessional Tax Regime The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee company’s appeal for AY 2023-24 and held that the benefit of the concessional tax regime under section 115BAA cannot be denied merely because the return of income was filed belatedly under section 139(4), when Form 10-IC was filed within the prescribed due date. The assessee had opted for taxation under section 115BAA and filed Form 10-IC wit...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930