Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO-Ward-1 Vs Shri Rohit (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO-Ward-1 Vs Shri Rohit (ITAT Chandigarh) Bogus Purchase Addition of ₹15.09 Crore Rejected: ITAT Chandigarh Upholds Deletion Where Sales Accepted and Purchases Backed by Evidence The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2021-22 and upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which had deleted an addition of ₹15.09 crore made under section 69C on account of alleged bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the entire purchases merely because certain suppliers had not filed income-tax returns, showed lower turnover, or had their...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930