Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vachhani Ketanbhai Mansukhlal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vachhani Ketanbhai Mansukhlal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Rajkot: Agricultural Income Cannot Be Arbitrarily Estimated Without Considering Expenses The Rajkot Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee (HUF) for AY 2018-19, holding that agricultural income cannot be assessed by ignoring genuine agricultural expenses merely because such expenses were not claimed in the return due to an oversight. The assessee had declared gross agricultural income of ₹32.61 lakh but failed to deduct agricultural expenses of ₹10.93 lakh in the return. The A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930