Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Himanshu Goel (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Himanshu Goel (ITAT Delhi) No Double Tax on Cash Sales, Sundry Creditors Also Protected: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Additions in Jewellery Trader’s Case The Delhi Bench “E” of the ITAT, in ITO v. Himanshu Goel (AY 2017-18), dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions aggregating to ₹1.20 crore, holding that the AO’s approach resulted in double taxation and internal inconsistency. The AO had made two major additions: ₹70.89 lakh as unexplained cash deposits under section 69A, and ₹51.58 lakh as unexplained sundry creditors, primarily due ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031