Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harun Ali Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harun Ali Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Section 263 Cannot Travel Beyond Limited Scrutiny: ITAT Quashes Revision on Labour Payments and 40(a)(ia)x The Delhi Bench “E” of the ITAT, in Harun Ali v. Pr. CIT (AY 2015-16), allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the revisionary order passed under section 263, holding that the PCIT exceeded jurisdiction by venturing beyond the scope of limited scrutiny. The assessment was originally completed under section 143(3) pursuant to limited scrutiny on specific CASS reasons—(i) mismatch of TDS credit vis-à-vis Form 26AS, (ii) mismatch in turnover between ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031