Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Himanshu Goel (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Himanshu Goel (ITAT Delhi) No Double Tax on Cash Sales, Sundry Creditors Also Protected: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Additions in Jewellery Trader’s Case The Delhi Bench “E” of the ITAT, in ITO v. Himanshu Goel (AY 2017-18), dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions aggregating to ₹1.20 crore, holding that the AO’s approach resulted in double taxation and internal inconsistency. The AO had made two major additions: ₹70.89 lakh as unexplained cash deposits under section 69A, and ₹51.58 lakh as unexplained sundry creditors, primarily due ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031