Follow Us:
Patna High Court: Section 68 addition unsustainable; ITAT wrongly enhanced onus despite established identity & bank trail The Patna High Court set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order restoring an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and reinstated the relief granted by the CIT(A). The assessee had received ₹1.91 crore through banking channels and furnished PAN details, confirmations, ledger accounts, bank statements, and income tax returns of the creditor for other years. While the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained cash credit, the CIT(A) delete...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Fantasy Sports Liable to GST as Skill Element Does Not Remove Uncertainty in Outcome: SC ALP Cannot Be Determined at Nil Without Comparable Analysis: ITAT Ahmedabad No Provision to Replace Actual Land Cost with Market Value for Section 80-IB(10) Deduction: ITAT Chennai ITAT Delhi Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as Sales Were Recorded ITAT Quashes Section 143(1) Adjustment as No Prior Notice Issued View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930