Follow Us:

Patna High Court: Section 68 addition unsustainable; ITAT wrongly enhanced onus despite established identity & bank trail

The Patna High Court set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order restoring an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and reinstated the relief granted by the CIT(A). The assessee had received ₹1.91 crore through banking channels and furnished PAN details, confirmations, ledger accounts, bank statements, and income tax returns of the creditor for other years. While the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained cas

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition Fails Once Identity and Source Are Proved: ITAT Delhi Quashes draft order & DRP’s directions as both erred in holding assessee eligible: Karnataka HC ITAT Bangalore Accepts assessee’s plea to exclude comparables failing turnover filter ITAT Orders Fresh Section 14A Disallowance computation for Lack of AO Satisfaction Reassessment Quashed as Limitation Ran From Original Assessment, Not Revision View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031