Follow Us:
Patna High Court: Section 68 addition unsustainable; ITAT wrongly enhanced onus despite established identity & bank trail The Patna High Court set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order restoring an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and reinstated the relief granted by the CIT(A). The assessee had received ₹1.91 crore through banking channels and furnished PAN details, confirmations, ledger accounts, bank statements, and income tax returns of the creditor for other years. While the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained cash credit, the CIT(A) delete...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Companies with significantly higher turnover are not comparable: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Visakhapatnam Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Time-Barred United Spirits Case: Remand in TP Case Does Not Extend Section 153 Limitation Assessment on Non-Existent Entity Held Void; ITBA Glitch Not a Valid Defense: Delhi HC: No Section 270A(8) Penalty for TP Adjustment Without Proof of Deliberate Concealment: Madras HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930