Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amandeep Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amandeep Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) Must Decide on Merits: ITAT Delhi Sets Aside Ex-parte Dismissal for Non-Prosecution The Delhi ITAT “SMC” Bench, comprising Shri Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member), allowed the appeal of Amandeep Singh for AY 2017-18 for statistical purposes, condoned a delay of 311 days, and set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A), NFAC, which had dismissed the appeal solely for non-prosecution. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had not adjudicated the grounds of appeal on merits and had merely dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Reiterating the settled ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031