Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mercy Chandira Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mercy Chandira Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai quashed reassessment proceedings where notice u/s 148 & order u/s 148A(d) were issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after 29.03.2022, contrary to the mandatory faceless procedure prescribed u/s 151A read with the e-Assessment of Income Scheme, 2022. Tribunal held that once the faceless scheme came into force, issuance of notice u/s 148 & allied proceedings had to be through the faceless mechanism & not by JAO. Following decisions of Telangana HC in Kankanala Ravindra Reddy, Bombay HC in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., ju...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delhi ITAT Upholds Deletion of Penny Stock Additions; Mere Suspicion and Investigation Reports Cannot Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031