Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Kumar Velusamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Bharat Kumar Velusamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

CIT(A) Passed Order After Assessee’s Death—Violation of Natural Justice; Matter Remanded for Fresh Hearing 

Legal heir filed appeals challenging CIT(A)’s orders dated 30.09.2024. Appeals were delayed by 237 days. Legal heir explained that the deceased assessee never informed him about ongoing assessment/appellate proceedings, & assessee had died on 13.06.2023—well before CIT(A) passed orders in 2024. Tribunal accepted this explanation & condoned delay.

On merits, Tribunal found that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031