Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Flat Booked in 2009 Saves Buyer from Huge 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition – Change of Flat Number Not Tax Evasion ITAT Steps In

Assessee purchased a flat for Rs.48,00,000 while stamp-duty valuation on registration dated 22/08/2016 stood at Rs.1,73,65,600. AO invoked u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) & added Rs.1,25,65,000, disregarding Assessee’s claim that the flat was originally booked in 2009 with payments of Rs.20,00,000 & Rs.28,00,000 duly evidenced in ban

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031