Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Intermesh Shopping Network Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Intermesh Shopping Network Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) DCF Valuation Cannot Be Rejected Just Because Projections Differ- Disclaimer in Valuation Report Not a Ground to Junk DCF Method: AO Should Have Referred to Valuation Officer —56(2)(viib) Addition Deleted Mumbai Tribunal examined validity of addition of ₹8,39,55,840 u/s 56(2)(viib) arising from share premium collected on allotment of equity shares. Assessee had obtained DCF-based valuation from a qualified CA; projections, discounting rate & methodology were confirmed by the valuer in statement u/s 131. AO rejected the valuation so...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930