Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kannadasan Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kannadasan Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) When Figures Are Misunderstood, Additions Fail: Tribunal Rewrites Entire Assessment- CIT(A) Misread Balance Sheet: ITAT Deletes Entire Sundry Creditor Addition – Huge Additions of ₹89.89L & ₹6.59Cr Collapse After Reconciliation Before ITAT Kolkata AO made addition of ₹89,89,366 alleging unexplained increase in sundry creditors. CIT(A) deleted this but wrongly added ₹14,54,029 by comparing total current liabilities in the audited balance sheet with only sundry creditors figure in ITR. Tribunal held CIT(A) completely misconstrued facts: ₹19,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930