Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) quashed as additional income was voluntarily disclosed and not based on seized material

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Ethirajulu Vajravel Kumaran (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement DCIT Vs Ethirajulu Vajravel Kumaran (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not sustainable since the additional income offered by the assessee was voluntary and addition is not based upon incriminating material seized during the course of search. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) upheld and appeal of revenue dismissed. Facts- A search and seizure operation u/s.132 of the Act was conducted in the case of M/s.Arunai Group & Others on 25.03.2021. The assessee was also subjected to search. During the course of the search, certai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *