Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Ojha Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinod Ojha Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad Tribunal examined validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by JAO by issuing notice u/s 148A(b) & final notice u/s 148 dated 28.07.2022, both issued in violation of the mandatory Faceless Reassessment Scheme notified vide CBDT Notification Nos.15/2022 & 18/2022. Tribunal noted from the record that the earlier notice dated 30.06.2021 was treated as 148A(b) notice pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in UOI vs Ashish Agarwal. However, the subsequent notices were again issued by the JAO & not the Faceless Assessing Officer,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930