Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Ojha Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vinod Ojha Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Hyderabad Tribunal examined validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by JAO by issuing notice u/s 148A(b) & final notice u/s 148 dated 28.07.2022, both issued in violation of the mandatory Faceless Reassessment Scheme notified vide CBDT Notification Nos.15/2022 & 18/2022. Tribunal noted from the record that the earlier notice dated 30.06.2021 was treated as 148A(b) notice pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in UOI vs Ashish Agarwal. However, the subsequent notices were again issued by the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031