Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Statutory Notice vs Reminder -Reminders Aren’t New Defaults- Only One Real Default- Penalty Overkill Corrected: ITAT Chennai Reduces 272A(1)(d) Levy The appeal concerned penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with three notices issued u/s 142(1). AO levied a total penalty of ₹30,000 treating each notice as a separate default, & the NFAC confirmed the levy. Before the Tribunal, the Assessee argued that only one statutory notice was issued (dated 28.06.2023) & the subsequent two notices (04.08.2023 & 15.11....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930