Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Statutory Notice vs Reminder -Reminders Aren’t New Defaults- Only One Real Default- Penalty Overkill Corrected: ITAT Chennai Reduces 272A(1)(d) Levy The appeal concerned penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with three notices issued u/s 142(1). AO levied a total penalty of ₹30,000 treating each notice as a separate default, & the NFAC confirmed the levy. Before the Tribunal, the Assessee argued that only one statutory notice was issued (dated 28.06.2023) & the subsequent two notices (04.08.2023 & 15.11....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930