Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Govindaswamy Vishnu Sankar Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Statutory Notice vs Reminder -Reminders Aren’t New Defaults- Only One Real Default- Penalty Overkill Corrected: ITAT Chennai Reduces 272A(1)(d) Levy The appeal concerned penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with three notices issued u/s 142(1). AO levied a total penalty of ₹30,000 treating each notice as a separate default, & the NFAC confirmed the levy. Before the Tribunal, the Assessee argued that only one statutory notice was issued (dated 28.06.2023) & the subsequent two notices (04.08.2023 & 15.11....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

U/s 263 Cannot Be Invoked Merely Because AO Made No Addition After Enquiry Search-Based Addition Cannot Be Made Through Reassessment; ITAT Quashes Entire Assessment Bangalore ITAT Condones 367-Day Delay and Rejects Challenge to NFAC Jurisdiction in Reassessment Case PCIT’s 263 Order Quashed: Goodwill Depreciation Allowed in Slump Sale Acquisition Canara Bank Wins on Multiple Tax Issues; Bangalore ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s 18 Grounds of Appeal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930