Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jalan Niketan Private Limite Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jalan Niketan Private Limite Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) The Assessee filed an appeal against the revision order u/s 263 passed by Pr.CIT on 24.03.2021 for AY 2016-17. The appeal, however, was filed 1355 days late, requiring condonation of an exceptionally long delay. To support condonation, the Assessee submitted an affidavit of its director Shri Pratik Jalan (full text visible on pages 2–3 along with stamp paper image). He stated that: • he was not conversant with technical matters of the Income-tax Portal;• mistakes occurred in computing delay;• appeal against the 263 order “should hav...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031