Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haribabu Yenuganti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haribabu Yenuganti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad ITAT Restores Appeal to CIT(A) — Opportunity Must Be Given Before Rejecting Appeal for Non-Compliance with s.249(4)(b): Hyderabad Tribunal examined the legality of dismissal of an appeal by the CIT(A)/NFAC on the ground that the Assessee had not deposited “advance tax equivalent” as mandated under section 249(4)(b) where no return had been filed. AO had reopened the case u/s 147 & completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144/144B, determining income at Rs. 62,94,561/- by making additions of cash deposits u/s 69A, estimated profit on ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930