The Tribunal held that revisionary powers cannot be used to substitute the AO’s view with that of the Pr. CIT. It emphasized that such substitution is beyond Section 263. The decision protects independent assessment decisions.
The issue involved whether jurisdictional officers could issue reassessment notices. The Court set aside High Court rulings after a retrospective amendment clarified their authority and remanded the matter.
The IFSCA amended the Finance Company Regulations, 2021 to permit Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to undertake leasing and financing activities. The amendment also prescribes minimum fund requirements and grants exemptions from certain regulations.
The court disposed of the petition after the State withdrew the contested GST cancellation order. Authorities were directed to restore the registration promptly. The ruling clarifies that defective orders may be withdrawn and corrected.
The High Court set aside the adjudication order after finding that the petitioner had not responded to the show-cause notice. It remitted the matter for reconsideration with an opportunity to present evidence.
The Court found that the authority acted solely on a recommendation without independent evaluation. It ruled that such action does not meet the statutory requirement of reason to believe.
The court held that solar power system supplies must follow the statutory 70:30 valuation mechanism, rejecting full 18% taxation. It ruled that separate invoicing does not negate eligibility for concessional treatment.
IFSCA amended its TechFin and Ancillary Services Regulations to create a separate regulatory framework for Trust and Company Services Providers in IFSCs. The amendment introduces registration, governance, compliance, and reporting requirements for TCSP entities.
The Court held that failure to consider a remand report acknowledging agricultural income constituted an apparent error, leading to recall of the earlier judgment and remand for fresh adjudication.
Explains when a lawyer’s refusal crosses into professional misconduct, especially in cases of discrimination or collective boycotts, and reinforces the duty to ensure access to justice.
