Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.N. Impex Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

P. N. Impex Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)

In this case, a writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order that cancelled the petitioner’s GST registration. The petitioner sought quashing of the impugned order dated 22.08.2025, along with the underlying Order-in-Original dated 26.06.2024 and the Show Cause Notice. The petitioner contended that these actions were taken without furnishing reasons, in violation of principles of natural justice, and resulted in retrospective cancellation of registration. Relief was also sought for restoration of GST registration and interim protection to continue business operations, including access to the GST portal.

The petitioner argued that neither the show cause notice nor the impugned order met the legal requirements, relying on various judicial precedents to support the contention that the absence of proper reasoning and procedural fairness rendered the action invalid.

During the proceedings, the matter had earlier been adjourned with a direction to the respondents to file a reply affidavit. When the matter was taken up again, the learned counsel for the State, on instructions, informed the Court that upon verifying the legal position, the concerned officers had decided to withdraw the impugned order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration.

In view of this statement, the Court recorded that the petitioner’s GST registration would stand restored. The respondents were directed to take necessary steps to give effect to this restoration on or before 10 March 2026 and to communicate the same to the petitioner via specified email addresses.

The Court clarified that all other rights and contentions of both parties were kept open. It was specifically noted that if any material is found in the future, the authorities are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law, and the petitioner would also retain the right to challenge such action.

Accordingly, the petition was disposed of in these terms, without any order as to costs.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT

1. This Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed praying for the following reliefs:

a. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, certiorari or any other appropriate writ thereby declaring that the Impugned Order dated 22.08.2025 (Exhibit-I), which stands merged with the Order-in-Original dated 26.06.2024 (Exhibit -D) and the Show Cause Notice (Exhibit — B), having been issued without furnishing reasons, in breach of the principles of natural justice, and resulting in retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner’s registration, is illegal, arbitrary and deserves to be quashed and set aside.

b. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the record and proceedings pertaining to the Impugned Order dated 22.08.2025 (Exhibit-I), the Order-in-Original dated 26.06.2024 (Exhibit — D) and the Show Cause Notice (Exhibit ­B) and upon examining the legality validity and propriety thereof, be further pleased to quash and set aside the same;

c. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith revoke the cancellation of the Petitioner’s GST registration and restore the same with effect from the date of cancellation or such other date as this Hon’ble Court deems fit;

d. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:

i. Stay the operation, implementation and effect of the impugned Order dated 22.08.2025 (Exhibit — I);

ii. direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to carry on his business and all related activities without any interruption, including access to the GST portal;

e. For interim and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d) above;

f. For costs of this Petition; and

g. For such further and other reliefs be granted to the Petitioner as this Hon’ble Court may deem proper and fit in the nature and circumstances of the case;

2. We had also heard this Petition on the earlier occasion. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has placed that the following decisions for the consideration of the Court, and has particularly contended that neither the show cause notice nor the impugned order satisfies the test of law.

i) Monit Trading (P) Ltd. V. Union of India

ii) Makersburry India (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra2

iii) Nirakar Ramchandra Pradhan Vs. Union of India3

iv) Ahmed Enterprises Vs. Union of India’

v) Assistant Commissioner (ST) Vs. Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt.Ltd.5

vi) Mahendra Prasad Agarwal Vs. Arvind Kumar Singh & Ors.in Civ. Appeal @ SLP© No.17141/2025.

vii) Kishor Nichani Vs. The Union of India & Ors. In WP No.4211/2025

3. On 28 February 2026, the matter was adjourned for today (i.e.6th March 2026) with a direction to the Respondents to place on record their reply affidavit. Considering the nature of the impugned orders and the legal position, Mr. Deolekar, learned AGP for the Respondent—State, on instructions, states that the concerned officers, upon verifying the legal position, withdraw the impugned order dated 22 August 2024 cancelling the Petitioner’s registration.

4. Accordingly, the Petitioner’s registration shall stand restored. Necessary action in that regard shall be taken on or before 10 March 2026. To this effect the Petitioner be issued an email intimation on the following email IDs:

1. Primpex7@gmail.com

2. sanath09@hotmail.com

5. Needless to observe that all other rights and contentions of the parties are expressly kept open, including the contention of the Respondents that, in the event any material is available/found, appropriate action in accordance with law may be taken against the Petitioner. If any such action is taken, the contentions of the Petitioner are also expressly kept open.

6. The Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.

Notes:

1 (2023) 8 Centax 248(Bom.)

2 (2023)11 Centax 295 (Born)

3 (2023)11 Centax 98 (Born)

4 (2023) 13 Centax 209 (Born.)

5 2022(57) G.S.T.L. 97 (S.C.)

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031