The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)’s deletion of Rs. 10,00,059/- as the addition was based solely on uncorroborated third-party information. No primary evidence linked the assessee to the alleged accommodation entries.
Tribunal rules that procedural delay in filing Form 10B does not bar exemption under sections 11 and 12, following Supreme Court guidance on procedural lapses.
ITAT quashed a reassessment under section 147 as the AO failed to issue the mandatory notice under section 143(2), rendering the assessment legally invalid.
The ITAT Hyderabad held that section 144C cannot override outer time limits under section 153. Assessments passed beyond statutory deadlines are void, reinforcing strict compliance with limitation periods.
Tribunal held that commission could not be treated as bogus where the recipient company’s existence was established through income tax returns, refunds, and official records, leading to deletion of the disallowance.
Court ruled that repayment of sums in cash violates Section 269T and attracts penalty under Section 271E, even when the same sums were treated as income under Section 68 in an earlier assessment.
The Calcutta High Court held that retrospective cancellation of a supplier’s GST registration alone cannot justify denial of Input Tax Credit, requiring a reasoned evaluation of submitted documents.
The Bombay High Court quashed an order as the show-cause notice failed to specify date, time, and venue for personal hearing, violating Section 75(4) of the GST Act. The Court restored the proceedings for lawful adjudication.
The Court held that documents seized during a survey justified rejection of accounts and best judgment assessment. Partial relief granted by the Tribunal was found adequate, warranting no further interference.
The Court quashed an ex-parte GST order where the initial notice did not comply with procedural requirements, emphasizing proper reissuance of notice and lawful proceedings.
