Allahabad HC quashed penalties under Section 129(3) of GST Act where Part B of the e-way bill was not filled due to a technical error and no intent to evade tax was found.
The Tribunal ruled that partial disallowance of section 54F deduction, without concealment or inaccurate particulars, does not warrant penalty under section 271(1)(c).
The High Court set aside reassessment proceedings after holding that notices issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer violate the faceless assessment mandate under Section 151A.
The Tribunal remanded the case after finding that reassessment and appellate orders were passed ex parte without examining key issues on transfer, valuation, and cost, directing a fresh assessment with opportunity of hearing.
The High Court held that once the Revenue accepted partial relief on bogus purchases, further reduction by the ITAT involved only estimation and raised no substantial question of law.
GST Audit Checklist Explained: Compliance Failures That Trigger Tax, ITC Reversal & Deemed Supplies; GST Audit Reveals ITC Risks Due to Section 16, Rule 42/43 & RCM Non-Compliance; GST Audit Checklist: Why Incorrect Classification, LUT Lapses & Export Errors Invite Scrutiny; GST Audit Findings Explained: Vendor Payment Delays, Capital Goods Sale & ITC Reversal Issues; […]
In the last two years, dozens of Indian startups—across SaaS, D2C, fintech, and tech sectors—have faced down-rounds, flat rounds, or even investor exits at lower valuations. Despite strong user growth, many founders discovered the hard way that overvaluation is not a badge of honour—it’s a trap. In 2025, with new RBI, CBDT, and Companies Act […]
The tribunal ruled that ignoring a valid adjournment request vitiates ex-parte assessment and appellate orders. The is that fair opportunity is mandatory before deciding tax disputes.
ITAT Raipur remands bogus purchase disallowance for a rice miller, awaiting the High Court’s ruling. The case will be reconsidered de novo following legal principles once HC decides.
Revenue challenged deletions of additions in a scrutiny assessment, highlighting procedural lapses under Rule 46A. Tribunal remitted the matter for fresh adjudication considering additional evidence filed by the assessee.
