Understand GST Rule 86B, its 1% cash payment rule, applicability, exceptions, calculation steps, and impact on businesses exceeding ₹50 lakh monthly turnover.
Finance Ministry notifies phased schedule for GSTAT appeals under Section 112. Appeals to be filed online at efiling.gstat.gov.in in stages till June 30, 2026, to prevent system overload.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that in terms of Rule 25 of the SEZ Rules, SEZ developer not utilizing the goods or services on which exemptions, drawbacks, cess and concession have been availed needs to refund the concessions so availed.
The Supreme Court dismissed Arham Infra Developers’ petitions against GST assessments, holding that alternate statutory appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.
These Public Interest Litigations are filed by the petitioners substantially seeking the relief of including the petrol and diesel under the GST regime so as to achieve a harmonized national market as contemplated under Article 279 (A) of the Constitution of India.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the interest on nonrecoverable loans has not been recorded by the assessee and accordingly no deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act was claimed. Thus, addition made thereon is liable to be deleted.
CBIC assigns proper officers and sets monetary limits for tax determination (Sec 74A) and penalty (Sec 122) under CGST Act. Officers’ jurisdiction depends on tax amount.
ITAT Chandigarh held that reopening of assessment on the basis of factually incorrect facts and reasons without application of mind and without verification of facts cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. Accordingly, reopening quashed and appeal of revenue dismissed.
The amendment to Explanation 1(d) of Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, effected vide Notification No. 14/2022 – Central Tax dated 05.07.2022, was prospective in nature, therefore, any claim for ITC made in respect of periods antecedent to the notification could not be sustained.
Mens rea was not essential for penalty under Section 117, revocation of the courier license was unwarranted; penalties under both Section 117 of the Customs Act and Regulation 14 of the 2010 Regulations were validly imposed.
