Follow Us:

Archive: 16 October 2025

Posts in 16 October 2025

CBI Arrests CGST Nashik Superintendent in Rs 5 Lakh Bribe

October 16, 2025 1110 Views 0 comment Print

CBI arrested a CGST Superintendent in Nashik accepting a Rs 5 lakh bribe related to an IGST matter. Searches yielded Rs 19 lakh cash. The accused is in police custody.

Notional Foreign Exchange Gain from year-end revaluation of a loan on capital account was not taxable income

October 16, 2025 453 Views 0 comment Print

Tax treatment of a foreign exchange fluctuation depended entirely on the nature of the underlying asset or liability. Gains or losses on capital items (like a long-term investment or loan) were not typically recognized for tax purposes until the asset was actually sold or the loan was repaid.

Provision for consumer loyalty program was an allowable deduction u/s 37 and no TP adjustment as profits of eligible units were at arm’s length

October 16, 2025 381 Views 0 comment Print

Provision for customer loyalty points, computed on a scientific and consistent basis, constituted a present and ascertained liability deductible under Section 37(1). Disallowance u/s 14A was deleted since no exempt income was earned during the year.

Penalty Imposed for Non-Filing of Annual Returns under Section 92(5)

October 16, 2025 633 Views 0 comment Print

ROC Goa imposed penalties on a company and its directors for failing to file Annual Returns for FY 2022-23. The ruling highlights the statutory obligation under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 and financial consequences for non-compliance.

No addition u/s 69A for undisclosed Jewellery as family inheritance and household withdrawals were sufficient to explain sources

October 16, 2025 816 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi held that notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act issued without specifying the specific charge or limb i.e. without striking off the irrelevant limb is erroneous. Accordingly, penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained.

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) set aside as notice failed to specify specific charge or limb

October 16, 2025 492 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi held that notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act issued without specifying the specific charge or limb i.e. without striking off the irrelevant limb is erroneous. Accordingly, penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained.

Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728