ITAT Chennai held that invocation of revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act not justified as AO has applied his mind and revision u/s. 263 cannot be possible for mere change of opinion. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Chennai held that adhoc disallowance of expenses merely on the basis of suspicion without adequate evidence and cogent reason is not tenable in law. Accordingly, adhoc disallowance under repair and maintenance and sundry expense set aside.
AAR Tamil Nadu held that ITC is eligible only on structural steel supports for cranes and HVAC in Shibaura Machine India case; ITC on civil works and PEB sheeting disallowed.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the Enforcement Directorate’s petition challenging Lalit Goyal’s travel, as the issue was rendered moot.
GST AAR rules consultation services for outpatients are exempt, but medicines sold to them are taxable as they are not a composite supply.
Tamil Nadu’s GST Authority for Advance Ruling has clarified the GST treatment for fly ash bricks, addressing their HSN code, applicable tax rates, ITC eligibility, and the inapplicability of reverse charge and composition schemes.
The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that MRF Limited can no longer use the cross-charge mechanism for distributing Input Tax Credit (ITC) for common input services. This ruling follows amendments to the CGST Act.
Karnataka High Court held that re-adjustment of ALP without passing a Draft Assessment Order as required under section 144C of the Income Tax Act is not tenable in law. Accordingly, order passed thereon is void ab initio.
Delhi High Court held that CESTAT does not have the power to admit appeal without the pre-deposit. However, since this is not a rare case necessitating interference, this court has not granted waiver from pre-deposit.
ITAT Pune rules that PCIT cannot revise an assessment under Section 263 if the AO took a plausible view. The 10% tolerance limit under Section 43CA is retrospective.
