Registrar of Companies, Puducherry penalized Mahe Royal Travancore Nidhi Ltd. and its directors for failing to maintain a registered office under Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ITAT Kolkata held that even after acceptance of fact that appellant is an entry provider, onus is on the appellant to prove that transaction was not of appellant but of somebody else’s. Accordingly, matter remanded for re-verification.
CBIC Chairman’s weekly newsletter dated 23rd December 2024 highlights pivotal developments. The 55th GST Council meeting in Jaisalmer emphasized simplifying the GST framework with decisions to facilitate trade, reduce litigation, and streamline compliance. Officers are urged to engage taxpayers to foster understanding and trust. The Board launched transformative initiatives on the CBIC website, including a […]
The Assessing Officer was not justified in making addition or disallowance on the issues as the Assessing Officer was not supposed to examine any other issue except the issue for which the scrutiny assessment was ordered.
PAN 2.0 project aims to simplify services, improve security, and provide a unified platform for all PAN/TAN-related services, enhancing user experience and efficiency.
Kolkata Bench of ITAT ruled in ACIT Vs Pujita Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. that Section 68 of IT Act is applicable when credit is received in the relevant year not for earlier years.
Service Tax Refund of Company cannot can be appropriated towards outstanding dues of proprietary concern of Director: Kerala HC
Associate Lumber Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai has emphasized that recovery cannot be made effective from the assessee before completion of the appeal period mentioned in section 129 A (3) of the Customs Act, 1962. Legislature has prescribed three months time from the communication of the order. In the […]
Devanur Thimmasetty Srinivasa Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Assessment order taking entirety of the sale consideration without taking note of the indexed cost of acquisition. is liable to set-aside- Karnataka HC In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court quashed an income tax reassessment order and notice issued to the petitioner where the full sale […]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka HC held that Notice and endorsement issued without waiting for expiry of the appeal period of three months is illegal and arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
