Entry provider needs to prove that transaction belonged to someone else: ITAT Kolkata

Silicon Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata held that even after acceptance of fact that appellant is an entry provider, onus is on the appellant to prove that transaction was not of appellant but of somebody else’s. Accordingly, matter remanded for re-verification. Facts- The appellant is admittedly an entry provider which fact has been admitted by Mr. Sumit Sharma, Director of the Appellant Company, before AO. The single grievance that arises from the impugned order pertains to an addition of Rs. 3,28,51,000/- added as Short-Term Capital Gain by AO and confirmed by CIT(A...