Legal provisions w.r.t to Form CHG-4: The eForm CHG-4 is required to be filed pursuant to Section 82(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 8(1) of Companies(Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014. What is Section 82? A company is required to give intimation to the Registrar in the Form CHG-4, on the payment or satisfaction […]
(1) These rules may be called the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) (Amendment) Rules, 2022. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 12th April, 2022 (No. 3 of 2022) F.No. A-12015/01/2022-HR/CCI.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (2) of Section 64, read with sub-section (3) of Section 17 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003) the Competition Commission of India hereby makes the following […]
ASPIRE Scheme ASPIRE is an abbreviated form of ‘A Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industries and Entrepreneurship’. It was launched on 16th March 2015. ASPIRE is a Government of India initiative which is promoted by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Objectives of ASPIRE scheme; eligibility criteria under ASPIRE scheme; components and […]
In re Mahalakshmi BT Patil Honai Construction (JV) (GST AAR Maharashtra) The first question raised by the applicant is whether the impugned contract is covered under the term ‘Earth Work’ and therefore covered under SI No 3A- Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-C.T. (Rate) […]
In re Vasant Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Q1. Whether the activity of fabricating and mounting Tankers, Tippers, etc. on the chassis provided by the owner of such chassis i.e. bus body building would be covered under the category of Supply of Services? A1. Supply of Bus body building on the chassis owned by […]
In re Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited (GST AAR Gujarat) Q1. Whether the recoveries made by the Applicant from the employees for providing canteen facility to its employees are taxable under the GST laws? A1. GST, at the hands of M/s Emcure, is not leviable on the amount representing the employees portion of canteen charges, which is […]
Srivenkateshware Tradex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Delhi Value Added Tax (Delhi High Court) It is not a case where there is a default or concealment or adverse material is found by the Commissioner suggesting inaccurate particulars in the returns. It is the case where all the documents and particulars were furnished correctly except that the […]
We find no reason to substitute the phrase ‘CGST Rules’ for the word ‘Notification’ referred to in section 97(2)(b). We find no merit in this submission and hold that AAR has its carved out functional jurisdiction to pass Rulings as per Section 97(2).
In re Cadmach Machinery Pvt Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether recovery of amount from employee on account of third party canteen service provided by assessee, which is obligatory under section 46 of Factories Act, 1948 would come under definition of, outward supply and, therefore, taxable as a supply under GST? Cadmach has arranged a canteen […]
