Galaxy Mechanical Engineering Equipments Private Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) In this matter, petitioner has challenged the impugned show-cause notice for cancellation of registration of the petitioner and suspending the registration of the petitioner by the same impugned show-cause notice itself and petitioner has further challenged the impugned show-cause notice for cancellation of […]
Kamla Chandrasingh Kabali Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT find that the claim of the assessee that she has declared income under the IDS 2016 cannot be a tenable explanation as the declaration was not supported by payment of due taxes on the income declared and, therefore, it was an invalid declaration. No other reasonable cause […]
ITAT held that when Indian A.E. is remunerated at arm’s length price (ALP) no further profit attribution is required and the issue of existence of P.E. becomes wholly tax neutral.
1. Amendment for use of Accounting Software having Audit Trail (i) Now all companies are “mandatory” required to use accounting software having audit trail of each transaction besides the original transactions were rectified or deleted. This requirement is applicable from April 01, 2021. (ii) Applicability of this provision is deferred for 1 year, hence it […]
PCIT Vs Vikas Telecom Ltd (Delhi High Court) In this case the learned Assessing Officer while farming the assessment order has not referred to any seized documents belonging to the assessee found during the course of search proceedings. In the remand proceedings the learned Assessing Officer has also submitted that no any incriminating materials have […]
Surani Steel Tubes Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) High Court noted that the entire base for reopening assessment is on the premise that there was ‘information’ supplied by the Investigation Wing and the Assessing Officer has made cursorily reference to high value transaction of Rs.26,42,027/- as well as also referred to accommodation entry entered […]
Dr. E.S. Krishnamoorthy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The facts with regard to ownership of property by three co-owners and their respective share in right and interest in the property is not in dispute. As admitted by the assessee himself, he owned 42.5% share in the property. The land owners have received two flats measuring 4092 […]
High court held that licensing of software products of Microsoft in the Territory of India by the Respondent was not taxable in India as Royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act read with Article 12 of the Indo US DTAA.
Explore the ITAT Delhi’s decision on Anandtex Int. P. Ltd’s case against addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Learn about the challenges related to share application money and share premium.
Allahabad High court held that granting of anticipatory bail does not arise for an offence which is bailable and a direction for the same can be issued only in respect of non-bailable and cognizable offences, the present anticipatory bail application deserves rejection and, accordingly, it is rejected.
