PCIT Vs Smt. Sarojini M. Kushe (Karnataka High Court) In the present case, Assessing Officer has adopted the rate of Rs. 1600/- per square feet merely based on the letter given by the developer which is not supported with any particulars. It cannot be ruled out the possibility of the developer giving an inflated figure […]
Suppose, an employee having Rs 20,00,000 in his EPF account makes a contribution of Rs 4,00,000 towards the EPF as well as the employer is making a similar contribution in a particular year. In this case, the contribution would be bifurcated as follows:
Experience of a candidate being a relevant criteria in a selection to the post of Assistant Professor, we do not see the Selection Committee as having overstepped its jurisdictional limits while conducting the selection.
Rattan Lal Bhardwaj Vs State Of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Article 39(d) of the Constitution of India provides for equal pay for equal work. This right of the person for equal pay for equal work is recognized as a fundamental right by various pronouncements of the Apex Court and the law is settled […]
Swetabh Suman Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (Uttarakhand High Court) The conviction of the appellant Swetabh Suman for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is upheld and confirmed. The sentence imposed on the appellant Swetabh Suman under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of […]
FCC Co. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT had directed the assessee to file the description of services rendered by the employees of the assessee on their visit to India and the corresponding clause under the Agreement for Dispatch of Engineers under which such services would fall. In response, the assessee furnished Annexure 1 for […]
Sanjay Vs The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) In the present case, absolutely no reason is forthcoming, nor the respondents have come with case as to what was the cause for terminating the Part Time Chairmanship of the petitioner. The State Government can only exercise this power on the basis of any relevant and […]
Chandra Sekhar Jha Vs Union of India & Anr (Supreme Court of India) The first proviso of Section 129E of the present Section enacts a limitation on the total amount which can be demanded by way of pre-deposit. The first proviso provides that the amount required to be deposited should not exceed Rs.10 Crores. In […]
Avijit Dewanjee Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that as the assessee has not ascertained the loss on account of embezzlement of cash in the books of account and it is shown as sundry debtors suspense account without charging it to the P&L account. At this stage, it is not possible to hold that it […]
ITO Vs Sh. Subhash Chandra Narang (ITAT Delhi) Undisputedly, the Assessing Officer has added an amount of Rs.3,18,61,356/- as long term capital gain. The aforesaid addition is as a result of couple of disallowances, viz., disallowance of cost of improvement amounting to Rs.1,65,39,435/- and deduction claimed under section 54F of the Act towards investment in […]
