MAT or minimum alternative tax refers to a tax paid to by a company in advance. We should note that companies must pay tax according to the provisions of the income tax act, the profit and loss account is calculated as per companies act,2013. So prior to MAT what happened was; companies having profits used […]
Income Tax dispute: Anugraha Shelters challenges capital gain assessment. Joint Development Agreement not treated as possession under sec.53A of Transfer of Property Act.
Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Air Cargo) (CESTAT Chennai) The issue involved the present case is that whether the Antenna for base station imported by the appellant is classifiable as parts of base station under CTH 85177090 as claimed by the appellant or as machine/equipment for the reception, transmission and conversion of […]
Perfect Trading Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (AIR) (CESTAT Chennai) In the present case, the adjudicating authority has also imposed penalty of Rs.2 lakhs. The adjudicating authority after considering the submissions made by the appellant that the goods were intended to be supplied to another customer of another country has allowed the request for re-export. […]
Mindtree Ltd Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) It was not intention of the Government to tax software services as information technology services including ‘Software Maintenance Services’ were excluded from ‘Business Auxiliary Services’; the explanation added in the definition of ‘Goods’ to include computer services if can only be prospective from 1.6.2007 and the […]
Rambagh Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) Present appeal has been filed to assail the Order-in-Appeal No. 215/2021 dated 25th June, 2021. The facts relevant for the impugned appeal are as follows:- That M/s. Rambagh Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. i.e. the appellant are engaged in providing different services relating to hotel […]
Interest earned from investments made with Co-operative Bank, not being Co-operative Bank was not deductible either under section 80P(2)(d) or under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Such interest income was to be assessed as income from other sources, however, deduction under section 57 was to be given in respect of expenditure for earning interest income.
Authority For Clarification and Advance Ruling Vs Aakavi Spinning Mills (P) Ltd (Supreme Court) As noticed, the Entry in question, as inserted into the Fourth Schedule to the Act, is clear and specific that is, Hank Yarn; it carries neither any ambiguity nor any confusion. Undoubtably, the yarn in the hank form (which is a […]
MSL Group India & Anr. Vs Eknath Narayan Shelar (Bombay High Court) Re-structuring of the organisation or resizing of the labour force does not give liberty to an employer to dispense with the services of all the employees and recruit fresh hands in their place – Bombay High Court It is an admitted position that […]
In the instant matter, the Authority finds that the chargesheet has been filed against Mr. Prabhu. The provisions of IPC under which charges have been framed are severe in nature and pertains to professional conduct of a valuer which are as follows – (a) Section 201- Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false […]
