Firstly, it is to be noted that currently, only companies and LLPs (collectively referred to as the ‘Corporate Debtor’ or ‘CDR’) can be subject to the provisions of the IBC. Thus, partnership firms, proprietary concerns, individuals etc. do not fall under IBC as on date and thus such persons will not be governed by the provisions of the Code.
ICAI has sent a Humble reminder to FM to for immediate consideration of their request(s) for extension of various due dates under Income-tax Act, 1961 especially Tax Audit Reports and related returns and Income Tax Return Forms for AY 2020-21. ICAI has also made an representation earlier on 13th December 2020. Full text of the […]
Central Government hereby notifies the dealers in precious metals, precious stones as persons carrying on designated businesses or professions — if they engage in any cash transactions with a customer equal to or above Rupees ten lakhs, carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.
These rules may be called the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2020. (2). They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
Manjula Finance Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee being the absolute owner of the shares gifted , had full enjoyment rights including to alienate, discard and even demolish, unless prohibited by some statutory provisions, it is within the powers of the assessee to make gift at its free […]
As a One-time condonation scheme, to regularize the non-generation of UDIN, it has been decided that Members will be allowed to generate the earlier missed UDINs for the documents signed between 1st February 2019 to 31st December, 2020. The scheme will be made available from 1st January, 2021 till 31st January, 2021.
Flower valley Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We find that certain trees lying on assessee’s land were cut since the same were obstructing the hire tension wires of the Electricity Company. For the same, the assessee was compensated for Rs.10.14 Lacs during the year. We observe that the assessee was engaged in […]
Sir Ratan Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Commissioner was clearly in error in invoking powers under section 263 on the ground that the Assessing Officer failed to examine the investments of the trust complying with the provisions of Section 11(5) and Section 13(1)(d) as how the trust was treating the investment, i.e., in […]
