Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs Smt. Pallavi Ravi (ITAT Bangalore) -
Assessee was not precluded from raising the issue of jurisdiction under section 153C, merely because it did not object to the same during assessment proceedings and participating therein, as the issue was purely a legal issue and could be raised at any time in the course of appellate proceedings....
Read More
Sri Nayaz Ahmed Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) -
Sri Nayaz Ahmed Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) State counsel to accept notice for respondents. 2. In the instant petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Order, dated 4-2-2019 vide Annexure-C, passed under section 83(1) read with section 5(3) of Karnataka Goods and Services Act of 2017 (hereinafter referred ...
Read More
M/s. Cornerview Construction & Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) -
M/s. Cornerview Construction & Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Now, coming to the primary contention of the learned Authorised Representative that all the transactions relating to purchase of flats should be taken as a single transaction for the purpose of filing the IDS statement and computing fee under section 234E of t...
Read More
Section 80JJAA – Deduction in respect of employment of new employees is allowed under Chapter VI-A of the IT Act. In case of an assessee opting to provision to sec 115BAA or Sec. 115BAB, all other deduction under Chapter VI-A will be not be allowed except to Sec. 80JJAA deduction on employment. This means, this […]...
Read More
Ayushi Patni Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) -
Since final consideration was paid and the possession of flat was received within a period of one year prior to the date of transfer of capital asset, then the same should be considered as the date of purchase, so as to allow the benefit of deduction under section 54F to assessee....
Read More
Supreme Court S3 Electricals and Electronics Private Limited Vs. Brian Lau & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 103/2018 with Civil Appeal No. 835/2018] On the matter getting settled between the parties, the NCLAT closed the proceedings and directed that AA shall fix the fee of IRP for the period he has worked and that shall be […]...
Read More
In re M/s. Royal Care Speciality Hospital Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu) -
The applicant is not eligible for the credit of tax paid on the Input services used exclusively for providing exempt services of health services to in patients such as laundry services used for in patients. For Input services such as housekeeping, leasing of equipment used for both exempt supply of health services to in patients and taxab...
Read More
In re M/s. Chennai Port trust (GST AAR Tamilnadu) -
In respect of continuous supply of service when the license is in effect , as per Section 31(5), the tax invoice, containing the details as per Rule 46 of CGST/TNGST Rules ,should be raised on or before due date of payment as ascertainable from the contract. It is seen in the sample contracts provided that in certain cases, the due date o...
Read More
In re Ms. Chennai Port Trust (GST AAR Tamilnadu) -
In the scenario of the license for renting of immovable property has expired and not in force but the licensee continues to be in Possession and occupation of the immovable properties , in cases where there is a provision in contract for continued supply of service after expiry or termination of the contract, the Rent Claim Advice is issu...
Read More
In re M/s. Murali Mogan (GST AAR Tamilnadu) -
Murali Mogan (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Tamarind supplied by the applicant which has not undergone the process of direct drying in sun or by industrial process is classifiable under CTH 08109020....
Read More
