Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Piramal Glass Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012–13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Piramal Glass Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue before us is, whether assessee’s claim of depreciation on non–compete fee @ 25% by treating it as an intangible asset is acceptable or not. As could be seen, this is a recurring dispute between the parties since the assessment year 1999–2000. Though, while deciding the issue in the assessment year 1999–2000, vide ITA no.4842/Mum./2004, dated 5th April 2013, the Tribunal has disallowed assessee’s claim of depreciation on non–compete fee by treating it as an intangible asset, however, while deciding assessee’s appeal in assessment ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date