Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 11 September 2019

Posts in 11 September 2019

Valuation – Substantial mark-up in supply of imported goods to customers when not indicates under-valuation of imports

September 11, 2019 837 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Voith Turbo Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Explains when Substantial mark-up in supply of imported goods to customers when not indicates undervaluation of imports Considering the nature of business of the appellant/importer and that the overheads involved in the business activity were bound to influence the price at which the […]

Withdrawal of Press Note No. 17 (1984 Series)

September 11, 2019 1530 Views 0 comment Print

The Press Note No. 17 (1984) series regarding Environmental clearance of Industrial Licence- conditions of Letter of Intent/Industrial Licence, relates to pre-1991 period. After the Industrial Policy Resolution 1991, and considering various amendments made to Notification No. 477(E) dated 25th July, 1991 only the following four Industries are covered under compulsory licensing:

Licensing requirement for Parts and Accessories in Defence Sector

September 11, 2019 414 Views 0 comment Print

In reference to Press Note 1 (2019 Series) dated January 1, 2019 it is hereby clarified that No Industrial Licence/Arms Licence is required for the manufacture of any parts or accessories in Defence Sector, unless they are specifically listed in any of the Annexures of the said Press Note.

HC dismisses petition for refund of late fees of Form GSTR-3B as alternate remedy exist

September 11, 2019 1134 Views 0 comment Print

Petitioner is seeking directions to respondents to refund late fee collected from him while filing Form GSTR-3B in his Cash Ledger in GST Portal so that he can utilise it for discharging his tax liabilities.

Last date of Import of Pulses for fiscal year 2019-20

September 11, 2019 522 Views 0 comment Print

All importers are requested to stick to the date and complete their import by 31.10.2019 and submit a final report of imports made by them by the 07th November, 2019 and RA’s will submit a consolidated report to the Headquarters by the 15th of November. 2019.

AAR Karnataka allows withdrawal of application by Office Official Liquidator

September 11, 2019 426 Views 0 comment Print

The Applicant, however, vide their letter dated 04.09.2019 have requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling quoting the reason that the questions raised in their application were based on Place of Supply and also sale & shipment of the aircraft has already been completed.

GST registration not needed for Charitable Activity of preservation of environment

September 11, 2019 1188 Views 0 comment Print

In re All India Disaster Mitigation Institute (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether the applicant is liable for registration if he is doing activity relating to disaster prevention, disaster mitigation and disaster management. Activities of the applicant relating to disaster prevention, disaster mitigation and disaster management are activities relating to “preservation of environment”. Thus, the activities of […]

ITC on construct of ‘bunds’ admissible if used for making zero rated supplies & if satisfy P&M condition

September 11, 2019 2202 Views 0 comment Print

Input tax credit of GST paid on goods and services used to construct the ‘bunds’ is admissible to M/s. Satyesh Brinechem Private Limited, provided that the bunds are used for making zero rated supplies and fulfill the conditions which are necessary for treating the bunds as ‘plant and machinery’.

TPO could not assume jurisdiction to determine ALP of a SDT not reported to him

September 11, 2019 1839 Views 0 comment Print

Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) It is indisputable that by virtue of sub-sections (2A) and (2B) of Section 92CA, in case of an international transaction, the TPO would have an authority to examine any international transaction which comes to his notice during the proceedings, whether a […]

Addition u/s 68 was justified in case failure of assessee to prove cash deposits in partnership firm by partners

September 11, 2019 3372 Views 0 comment Print

Since assessee had explained that the two partners had cash deposited out of the cash receipts against advanced sale of land in individual however, assessee could not furnish any details evidence of holding of land, agreement with the purchasers and date/mode of source of receipts either before AO or before CIT(A), therefore, AO was correct in holding these credits as unexplained in the hands of assessee.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031