If a human error which can be seen on naked eye is detected, such human error cannot be capitalised for penalisation. Normally, this Court could not have persuaded to accept the contention on prima facie value as it is a matter for decision by competent authority and this Court can only order release of the vehicle and goods as against Bank guarantee.
Small Industries Development Bank of India Request for Proposal (RFP) For Concurrent Audit of Operations of Institutional Finance Vertical (IFV), SIDBI
Nelcast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The issue is whether the appellants are eligible for availing the credit on the service tax on premium paid for insurance policies which are in the nature of group insurance and personal accident insurance. The original authority has discussed the provisions u/s.38 of Employees […]
In re OPTA Cabs Private Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) The appellate authority for advance ruling upheld the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the GST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR ADRG 14/2018 dated 27/07/2018 ie the services of transportation of passengers supplied through the Appellant’s electronic platform and digital network would be liable to tax […]
Submission of Report of the Expert Committee for listing of equity shares of companies incorporated in India on foreign stock exchanges and vice versa
Commissioner of State Tax, Maharashtra State is hereby pleased to delegate the powers and duties conferred or imposed upon the Commissioner and assign the functions and duties as proper officer, to all the State Tax Officers,
Exposure Draft of Standard on Auditing for Audits of Smaller and Less Complex Entities (SASE) 200- Last date for comments: January 17, 2019- Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing for Audits of Smaller and Less Complex Entities
A case was registered on 08.01.2018 against the private person (retired Income Tax Inspector) on a complaint alleging that the accused had demanded a bribe of Rs. 70,000/- on behalf of Income Tax Officer for not imposing penalty regarding settlement of complainant’s Income Tax matter.
Suggested format for Appointment Letter To ABC and Co., Chartered Accountants <<<Address>>> Dear Sirs, Sub: Appointment of GST Auditors (Joint Auditors) under section 35(5) and section 44(2) of the CGST Act read with Rule 80(3) of the CGST Rules [read with the corresponding provisions of the State / Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Acts] […]
Neha Gupta Shifting of Registered Office under Section 12 & 13 as per Companies Act 2013 Introduction & Meaning of Registered office: A registered office is the official address of a company to which all official letters and reminders are sent by any person, any government or non- government or regulatory body. In terms of […]
