In the case of Venture Pvt.Ltd vs. DCIT, ITAT Mumbai has held that (1) the Net profit shown in the Profit and loss account should be adjusted with the items given in Notes to accounts, meaning thereby,
ITAT Kolkata held In the case of Sri Som Dutt v ACIT that whenever, the money has been received from overseas, then the onus is on the Assessee to prove that all the transactions are bonafide when he is claiming that the amount has been received as Capital Receipt.
ITAT Chandigarh held In the case of M/s Shree Dhanwantri Herbals vs. The ITO that the careful reading of the form 10CCB, in a serial order would clearly show that the assessee is required to inform the location of the Industry and column (c) specifically ask the assessee to state whether business is a new business
S.O. 2454(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause [A] of section 138 of the Finance Act, 2015 (20 of 2015), the Central Government hereby appoints the 9th day of September, 2015 as the date on which the provisions of clause [13] of the said section, sections 140,141, 142 and clause (ii) of section 143 of the said Act shall come into force.
History of problems in return utility:- In 2012-2013, the return utility (July-Sept) had the facility of inserting an additional row and mentioning that differential rate of tax; thereby showing the additional tax to be paid in a particular month for a particular service.
The extent of service tax in case of renting of any motor vehicle designed to carry passengers is depend on whether the provider of service has availed abatement or not. The condition to avail abatement is provided vide notification 26/2012 dated 20th June, 2012.
The Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. B. C. Srinivasa Setty, 128 ITR 294, held that no capital gains tax is payable by an assessee where it was not possible to compute the capital gains u/s.48 of the Act. It held that capital gains could not be computed in cases where the cost of acquisition could not be conceived at all.
CA V. Sundararajan A dealer is engaged in importing and selling fork lift. For selling of fork lift the dealer is collecting taxes @5% (Capital goods-commodity code no -2025). However the assessing officer is of the view that fork lift will fall under the category of motor vehicles-and are liable to tax @14.5% under the […]
Dipesh Murarka Rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 places following conditions and procedures for export of goods under bond without payment of duty. Let us see the conditions first:- CONDITIONS Any goods may be exported without payment of duty from a factory of the manufacturer or producer or warehouse or any other premises, […]
the Central Government had extended the anti-dumping duty imposed on the subject goods originating in, or exported from the subject countries vide notification No. 07/2014-Customs (ADD)
