We would think that the moment the assessee pours the chemicals into the effluent, he will cease to be the owner and at that point of time the awarder must be deemed to have taken delivery of the same. In our view the fact that upon it being poured into the effluent, it loses its identity and that it is consumed will not detract from the fact that there is delivery of the same to the awarder. The assessee does not have a case that the effluent belongs to the assessee.
Facing flak over its tax-friendly regime allegedly facilitating the flow of black money, Mauritius has promised full support to India’s quest for unearthing the source and destination of such illicit wealth.At the same time, the Indian Ocean’s island nation has also asserted that it will not allow any “sensational fishing expedition” and has taken strong exception to its name being linked to each and every financial scandal.
These are appeals against the order dated 24.09.2007 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in L.P.A. No.1098 of 2006 and against the order dated 02.11.2007 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in Review Application No.396 of 2007.
Commissioner Of Central Excise (CCE) vs M/S Patran Pipes (P) Ltd. – There is concurrent finding of fact recorded by the Commissioner and the Tribunal that there was nothing to show that the amount of cash seized represented clandestine sale of excisable goods.
Your Kind attention is invited to Board’s Circular No.5/2011-Customs dated 17.1.2011 wherein it was informed that, since BCCI has ceased to be a National Sports Federation or Apex Body for the game of Cricket in India, BCCI would not be eligible for the benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. dated 1.3.2002 or any other Customs notification. For the purpose of removal of doubts, it is clarified that, the ineligibility indicated therein, of BCCI or any one certified by BCCI, applies wherever BCCI claims a notification benefit by virtue of being National Sports Federation / Apex Body controlling the game of Cricket.
The second contention of the appellants is that the law of pleadings and the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, apply to the proceedings before the CLB. Therefore, the CLB ought not to have taken note of the new pleadings made by the impleaded parties and ought not to have accepted the pleadings made without any evidence.
DBOD.Dir.BC. 81/13.03.00/2010-11- Government of India, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) has formulated a scheme on financing of Off-Grid and Decentralised Solar (Photovoltaic and Thermal) applications as part of the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM). Under the scheme, banks may extend subsidised loans to entrepreneurs at interest rates not exceeding five per cent where refinance of two per cent from Government of India is available. In this context, we advise that such lending at interest rates not exceeding five percent per annum where refinance of Government of India is available, would not be considered to be a violation of our Base Rate Guidelines.
Trade and Industry has again represented that in respect of some export shipments prior to 12.01.2010, the benefit is being denied because the export product has been described on the shipping bill as “cotton powerloom-tufted bathmats/cotton powerloom-tufted bathrugs”. The representation says that a powerloom only weaves and cannot ‘tuft’. At the time of custom clearance they had to declare as to whether their export product is manufactured on a handloom or a powerloom. Since these cotton bathmats/bathrugs were not woven but tufted by using a tufting machine similar to table-top type sewing machine, the expression “cotton powerloom tufted” came to be used on the shipping bills. The Trade and Industry has, therefore, requested to issue necessary clarification that benefit of Chapter 3 of FTP may also be granted to such shipments.
Regional Authorities (RAs) of DGFT disburses deemed export drawback and terminal excise duty as per provisions of FTP and HBP Vol. I. In order to facilitate this process and faster disbursal of such claims, it has been now decided that payment of such claims, henceforth, shall be made online. To give effect to this decision, RAs are required to take following actions:-
The government may miss the target of garnering Rs 40,000 crore through disinvestment as SAIL’s follow-on public offer is now expected to hit the market in the next fiscal due to volatile stock market.”No, no… we will wait. There is very less time left in this fiscal. We are looking at market conditions,” Steel Minister Beni Prasad Verma said when asked whether SAIL FPO would hit the market before March 31.
