The principal notification No .39/1996-Customs, dated 23rd July, 1996 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section3, Sub-section (ii) vide number G.S.R. 291(E) dated the 23rd July, 1996 and was last amended by notification No.124/2008- Customs, dated the 21st November, 2008 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub- section (ii) vide number G.S.R. 184 (E), dated the 21st November, 2008.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18, 20 and 22 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 38/2007-Customs, dated the 9th March, 2007, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide G.S.R. 186 (E), dated the 9th March, 2007, except as respect things done or omitted to be done before such rescission.
Provided that no anti-dumping duty shall be imposed on the imports into India of the subject goods from M/s Guangdong Monalisa Ceramic Co. Ltd., People’s Republic of China (Producer) and M/s Foshan Monalisa Industry Co. Ltd., People’s Republic of China (Exporter) through M/s Ava Corp., Hong Kong (Exporter)
whereas, in terms of rule 4 read with rule 23 of said Customs Tariff Rules, the designated authority is required to investigate as to the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping in relation to import of any article, to identify the article liable for anti-dumping duty, to recommend the amount of anti-dumping duty equal to the margin of dumping or less, which if levied, would remove the injury to the domestic industry and to review the need for continuance of anti-dumping duty on such article;
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 46 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and in consultation with the Reserve Bank, the Central Government, having considered it necessary in the public interest, hereby makes the following further amendments in the Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transactions) Rules, 2000, namely
Notification No. SO 1324(E) Date of Notification : 22.05.2009 Effective date of implementation of specified Rules of Limited Liability Partnership Rules, 2009 S.O.1324(E).–In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of Rule 1 of the Limited Liability Partnership Rules, 2009, made under Section 79 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009), the […]
Circular No. 114/08/2009-ST Dated: May 20, 2009. F.No.354/163/2006-TRU Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, (Tax Research Unit),Room No.153, North Block, New Delhi, Subject: Refund of service tax paid on taxable services taxable services which are provided in relation to the authorised operations in a Special Economic Zone – Reg. Notification No.9/2009-Service Tax, dated 3.3.2009 was issued to provide refund of […]
Online CPT examination became a reality this year for aspiring CA students. Under the system, they had questions that test their knowledge and intelligence, appearing on computer screens at the click of a mouse. This is going to be the future of the examination system in the Institute. The Institute is ushering in a revolution […]
Notification No. 46/2009 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (ii) in the Explanation to clause (d) of the proviso to sub-section (5) of section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), read with rule 6DDB of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. as a recognized stock exchange for the purpose of the said clause with effect from the date of publication of
Whether, the ITAT has erred in law in holding that reimbursement of expenses on account of catering charges and fuel etc. to the assessee were not part of the gross receipts for the purposes of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 5. Before further discussion, we think it just and proper to quote the provisions contained
