Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 20 May 2009

Posts in 20 May 2009

Postmortem of Union Budget 2024: A Comprehensive Webinar

July 18, 2024 4275 Views 3 comments Print

Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!

Live Course on 360 degree Analysis of Input Tax Credit from a Litigation Perspective

July 18, 2024 3774 Views 0 comment Print

Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!

PAN requirement for transfer of shares in physical form : SEBI

May 20, 2009 2173 Views 0 comment Print

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) vide circular ref. no. MRD/DoP/Cir-05/2007 dated April 27, 2007 made PAN the sole identification number for all participants transacting in the securities market, irrespective of the amount of such transaction.

Notification No. 45/2009 – Income Tax Dated 20/5/2009

May 20, 2009 355 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 45/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Fluid Control Research Institute, Palakkad has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules), with effect from 1.4.2008 in the category of ‘other Institution

CESTAT is correct in allowing benefit of penalty upto 25% of duty amount

May 20, 2009 822 Views 0 comment Print

The argument of the Revenue that the judgement in Dharmendra Textile Processor’s case (supra) would apply and penalty equal to the amount of duty of excise assessed by the Assessing Authority is to be paid. We are afraid that such an argument would not be available because judgement in Dharmendra Textile Processor’s case (supra) dealt with Section 11 AC of the Act and has concluded the mandatory nature of the penalty contemplated by the proviso . In para 26, reference has been made to the Union Budget of 1996-97, when Section 11 AC of the Act was introduced.

Nigerian Cheated Income Tax official

May 20, 2009 607 Views 0 comment Print

Mumbai: Being an I-T official, Ajaykumar Singh (38)—who rummages through documents to detect tax evasion—should have smelt a rat when he received an SMS saying he had won three lakh pounds in a lottery. However, the Powai resident not only fell for the Nigerian scam but also followed instructions regarding payment towards processing charges till the […]

SEBI : PAN requirement for transfer of shares in physical form

May 20, 2009 604 Views 0 comment Print

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) vide circular ref. no. MRD/DoP/Cir-05/2007 dated April 27, 2007 made PAN the sole identification number for all participants transacting in the securities market, irrespective of the amount of such transaction.

Notification No. 44/2009 – Income Tax Dated 20/5/2009

May 20, 2009 385 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 44/2009 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (22B) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby specifies the “United News of India, New Delhi” as a news agency set up in India solely for collection and distribution of news for the purposes of the said clause for the assessment years 2009-2010 to 2011-2012

Notification No. 15/2009 – Service Tax, dated 20-05-2009

May 20, 2009 3635 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 15/2009-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.9/2009-Service Tax, dated the 3rd March, 2009 which was published in the Gazette of India,

CA charged for violation of FEMA rules & Rs. 26 lakhs penalty imposed

May 20, 2009 880 Views 0 comment Print

The documentary evidence which was placed by the appellant before the Appellate Authority should have been considered independently of provisions of Section 72 of the FERA . The appellant could prove his contention with evidence available including the documents. If the documents are not authenticated the appellant could be given opportunity to prove the documents and their contents. His contention could not be rejected merely because the documents were not authenticated.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031