Follow Us :

Archive: 26 July 2006

Posts in 26 July 2006

Public Notice No. 35 (RE-2006)/2004-09, Dated: 26.07.2006

July 26, 2006 232 Views 0 comment Print

The goods for which the claim has been made are meant for utilization for production of goods meant for export and/or for utilization for export of services of the EOU/EHTP/STP unit and will be utilized only in our factory and we shall not divert or dispose off the material procured without obtaining prior permission of the concerned Development Commissioner.

Notification No. 24 (RE-2006)/2004-2009, Dated: 26.07.2006

July 26, 2006 295 Views 0 comment Print

The PVC flooring scrap shall consist of thoroughly blended composition of thermoplastic binder, fillers and pigments. The thermoplastic binder shall consist substantially of one or both of the following namely (a) Vinyl Chloride polymer and (b) Vinyl Chloride co-polymer.

Notification No. 37/2006-Central Excise, Dated: 20.07.2006

July 26, 2006 262 Views 0 comment Print

The principal notification No.4/2006-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2006, published vide G.S.R. 94 (E) dated the 1st March, 2006 was last amended vide notification No. 35/2006-Central Excise, dated the 21st June, 2006 published vide G.S.R. 375 (E), dated the 21st June, 2006.

Circular No. 831/08/2006-Central Excise, Dated: 26.07.2006

July 26, 2006 508 Views 0 comment Print

Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been amended to introduce an optional scheme for enabling voluntary payment of duty by assessees, in full or in part, in cases involving fraud, mis-statement etc. along with interest and 25% of the duty amount as penalty within 30 days of the receipt of the show cause notice thereby dispensing with the rigours of adjudication procedure

Rate of exchange of conversion for exported goods w.e.f. 01.08.2006

July 26, 2006 169 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.73/2006-NT-Customs, dated the 27th June, 2006 [S.O.953(E), dated the 27th June, 2006].

Rate of exchange of conversion for imported goods w.e.f. 01.08.2006

July 26, 2006 199 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.72/2006-NT-Customs, dated the 27th June, 2006.

Notification No. 197/2006-Income Tax Dated 26/7/2006

July 26, 2006 292 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 197-Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization M/s. Lokmanya Medical Research Centre, Chinchwad, Pune has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 6 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the category ‘University,

Notification No. 196/2006-Income Tax Dated 26/7/2006

July 26, 2006 241 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 196-Income Tax Whereas the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (iii) of sub-section (4) of section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), has framed and notified a scheme for Industrial Park, by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Department of Industrial Policy

Notification No. 195/2006-Income Tax Dated 26/7/2006

July 26, 2006 343 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 195-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iv ) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies that any income received by any person on behalf of “Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Paryavaran Bhavan, section-10A, Gandhinagar” (hereinafter referred to as the “Institution”) shall not be Included in the total

Even in absence of a provision, Beneficial statute may be held to be retrospective in nature

July 26, 2006 7840 Views 1 comment Print

In the case of Vijay v. State of Maharashtra & others (2006) 6 SCC 286 Apex Court held that It is now well-settled that when a literal reading of the provision giving retrospective effect does not produce absurdity or anomaly, the same would not be construed to be only prospective. The negation is not a rigid rule and varies with the intention and purport of the legislature

Search Post by Date
June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930